Court Record Comics Episode 3 cover: What did the CWLF supervisors say, and how did the court determine responsibility?

Court Record Comics · VOL.3 · EP.03

Review｜What Did the CWLF Supervisors
Say in Court?

How did the supervisors explain their actions in court? How did the court examine those statements and reach its findings? This episode compares their testimony with the first-instance judgment.

10 cardsVOL.3 Episode 3System Accountability

Start Reading ↓

EDITOR'S NOTE

Review｜What Did the CWLF Supervisors Say in Court?

During the first-instance trial of Child Welfare League Foundation social worker Chen Shang-jie, three CWLF supervisors testified about the supervisory system, work procedures, case management, and what they knew and believed about Chen's child-protection work.

Their testimony, together with work records and other evidence, became an important part of the court's examination of the management relationship between CWLF and its cooperating caregivers, supervisory responsibility, and whether Chen fulfilled her duties to verify, follow up, and make mandatory reports.

How did the supervisors explain their actions in court? How did the court examine their statements and make its findings?

Through these ten cards, we revisit the three supervisors' testimony and compare it with the facts and responsibilities identified in the first-instance judgment.

The purpose of accountability is not a witch hunt, nor is it merely to blame one social worker. It is to clarify every layer of supervision and management so that another child is not failed by the system.

※ These cards summarize key points from the first-instance hearing records and judgment; they are not verbatim transcripts. The three supervisors were not criminal defendants in this case. Chen Shang-jie was the defendant at the first-instance trial.

#DoNotLetTheKaikaiCaseFade#ChenShangJieCase#SystemAccountability

READ THE COMIC